<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Highest Form of Mention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.economicprincipals.com/issues/2010.07.04/1157.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.economicprincipals.com/issues/2010.07.04/1157.html</link>
	<description>A Web-based independent commentary on the production and distribution of economic ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:39:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Loundy</title>
		<link>http://www.economicprincipals.com/issues/2010.07.04/1157.html/comment-page-1#comment-1880</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Loundy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 22:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economicprincipals.com/?p=1157#comment-1880</guid>
		<description>Print will continue it&#039;s slide into irrelevance. Scarcity does not equate to value if that scarcity is caused by lack of demand.

Among the coming dominant, plugged-in market, [those craving publicity] would have to be told that they were mentioned in, say, the New York Times in print. Relying on that is like predicating print circulation upon on the loyalty of parents with kids in sports. That loyalty, therefore the value of the print product, is transitory and constantly churning. Mentions in specific venerated brands will continue, but print is already well into the drain circling phase. ... 

[M]y article on this point at http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0910/circling-the-drain.html </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Print will continue it&#8217;s slide into irrelevance. Scarcity does not equate to value if that scarcity is caused by lack of demand.</p>
<p>Among the coming dominant, plugged-in market, [those craving publicity] would have to be told that they were mentioned in, say, the New York Times in print. Relying on that is like predicating print circulation upon on the loyalty of parents with kids in sports. That loyalty, therefore the value of the print product, is transitory and constantly churning. Mentions in specific venerated brands will continue, but print is already well into the drain circling phase. &#8230; </p>
<p>[M]y article on this point at <a href="http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0910/circling-the-drain.html" rel="nofollow">http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0910/circling-the-drain.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

